Revised Paragraphs

Fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, teachers and counselors are just a few of the many people who affect the lives of students. A name for this group of people who affect students, especially when it pertains to literacy learning, is sponsors. As Deborah Brandt puts it “sponsors deliver the ideological freight that must be borne for access to what they have” (557). This means that whether it is support and encouragement or even access to materials, sponsors shape how sponsees  see and view aspects of life and learning. Most sponsors are what are called facilitators which are those who encourage and give materials to further a learners literacy. While facilitating sponsors help a learner, there are some sponsors who withhold from a learner. Though they differ in their roles facilitators and withholders are still sponsors who effect a learner’s literacy, albeit in different ways.

Revision Plan, Project 3

  1. Im adding and challenging brandt within my paper, but I need to do more and use more evidence from brand and from litnars.
  2. Because my draft was lacking in completion I have barely a tenth of the info and evidence I need to make a good paper.
  3. I need to add in info/evidence from at least one more scholarly journal and at least three litnars.

Relative Narratives in Rising Cairn

I find sponsors of both types, facilitating and withholding, to be interesting. In my paper, I’ll focus on how each type of sponsor affects the learner/author in/of the LitNar.

 

The Year I started to hate writing

Learning to Not Hate English

The Progress for Getting a Better Teacher for English

Sixty?

The Wizard of OZ Saved my Brian

How I Graduated Study Skills

ENG110J

Nov 1st

Q4. For each SPONSOR, imagine how he/she might view the central literacy moment in the story. Williams suggests the value of this thinking in suggesting that students “rewrite the key moment (or moments) of the narrative from the position of a different identity” (345). WRITE ABOUT the SPONSOR’s perspective. Briefly note relevant detail/evidence from the LN that suggests that perspective.

1LN

Mrs. Ouimette and Mr. Augello would appreciate it and be proud that they helped a student learn to enjoy reading.

2LN

The freshman teacher would probably not like being portrayed as a unhelpful mentor, and Mr. Phelps would like that he helped out his students.

3LN

Both Tubbs and Estabrooks would like that they were able to help a student to learn to love writing.

4LN

The teachers would be glad that they didn’t completely ruin his love of reading and that he doesn’t dislike them because he now realizes it was for his own good to be exposed to the “harsh” material

 

Q5. What strikes you as INTERESTING, COMPLICATED, or otherwise worth NOTING? (Use shorthand or fragments, but attempt to say WHY it’s interesting/complicated.) Here YOU start to decide what’s important FOR YOU.

1LN

Only Hero?

No real evidence of negative sponsor

2LN

Kinda victimish but not really

Hero is the only category that comes close the others are a stretch

3LN

Hero,hero,hero  every time

Needs to make more clear defined identity(s)

4LN

The way identities shift in this LitNar makes it the most interesting of mine.

css.php